Reynolds Rap

Trumprosecution, Part 2:
The Dire Consequences for Black People

Never, ever ignore the rule! The rule: If it's bad for White people, it's going to be excruciatingly terrible for Black people! Again, if it's bad for White people, it's going to be excruciatingly terrible for Black people!

> When unemployment is "kinda high" for White folks, it's exceedingly high for Black folks

> When income levels for White folks drop, income levels for Black people disappear

> Even when arrested for the same crime, Black people are consistently, perpetually arrested more often and receive harsher sentences than White people

> COVID-19? The total number of White deaths per 100,000 through March 2, 2021 is 150.2, versus the total number of Black deaths of 179.8.

And now, the extremely well-orchestrated persecution of Donald Trump has finally resulted in a criminal indictment.

Justice is supposed to be fair, objective, and consistently applied, right?

Well, that's never been true. You do remember what happened to Cosby, don't you?

Here's the way "justice" has always worked in the United States: Prosecutors, judges, and legislatures can and do unilaterally go back and "selectively pick," or create, or amend laws to achieve their own malicious objectives. Consider the millions of people arbitrarily incarcerated based on the constant flip-flops in federal, state, and local laws on drug use, from alcohol (prohibition) to marijuana to a plethora of legal, semi-illegal and illegal drugs listed in the Controlled Substances Act.

Again, if "they" want to get you, they are going to find a way, make a way, to get you! The "issue" behind the recent indictment of Donald Trump is not his innocence or guilt; nope. Not at all. If fact, throughout U.S. history, "innocence" has never been the cornerstone of U.S. jurisprudence; likewise, justice is supposed to be fair, and objective? Really?

You do remember what happened to Michael Jackson's doctor, don't you?

So, sit back, and get ready, because it's coming, the prosecution of Barack Obama, or the prosecution of members of the Congress. So, sit back, and get ready, because it's coming, the prosecution of Barack Obama, or the prosecution of members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Denzel Washington, Whoopi Goldberg, etc. Oh, yeah. It's coming.

Just sit there, do nothing, it's coming.

Who's a likely target?

The indictment of Donald Trump is great for Kamala Harris!

In 1870, the 15th Amendment, which gave Black men the right to vote, was ratified to prohibit states from denying a male citizen the right to vote based on “race, color or previous condition of servitude."

"Black suffrage" in the United States in the aftermath of the American Civil War explicitly referred to the voting rights of black men only. Black women still had many hurdles to face before obtaining this right.

The passage of the 19th Amendment, which was ratified by the United States Congress on August 18 and then certified as law on August 26, 1920 technically granted women the right to vote.

However, the 19th Amendment did not initially extend to women of African American, Asian American, Hispanic American and American indian heritage because of widespread enduring inequality and racism from within the ranks of the women's suffrage movement.

It wasn't until the Voting Rights Act was passed nearly a half century later, on August 6, 1965 that Black women were officially allowed to exercise their right to vote. You got that?

Simply put, Kamala Harris is fair game. "They'll" be coming for Vice President Kamala Harris, too. Why her? Harris has a well-documented history of flip-flopping on nearly everything that comes out of her mouth, which makes her a very likely target to be investigated for her stupidity, mistakes, and corruption. For example:

Kamala Harris
Vice President of the
United States of America

Again, prosecutors, judges, and legislatures can and do unilaterally go back and "selectively pick," or create, or amend laws to achieve their own malicious objectives. For example, consider how Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas "interprets" the receipt of . . . gifts.

So, wait for it. Wait for it. It's coming.

I welcome your feedback.

Trip Reynolds
trip.reynolds@yahoo.com

First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.